Others don’t understand “corrupt” Monday, Nov 21 2005
The front page story in today’s Times Picayune is headlined: ” Storm work deals go to inside players.” The sub-title is: Contracts could hurt state’s image.
Our public officials continue to bemoan and protest the “bad rap” that LA gets because of the”perception” of corruption. They sit before Congress and complain to the media that LA’s reputation for corruption is a “thing of the past.”
For these people to continue to deny the existence of corruption in LA, is obviously a failure to understand the definition of “corrupt” as is it is understood by those outside of LA.
The understanding in LA of being “corrupt” means that someone steals something or does something illegal. Our former 4-term governor, Edwin Edwards seems to have set the “gold standard” for corruption at: “If it is not illegal, it is okay to do.”
Unfortunately, the LA media seems to have accepted that definition. For example, the media continues to describe the Mike Foster Administration as “scandal-free.” Apparently, being found guilty and fined for violating the state’s ethics’ law is not a scandal. By inference, the media would find the Foster Administration to be “non-corrupt.” How can a public official, even by LA’s low standards violate a state law (with criminal sanctions) and be found to be “scandal-free” or “non-corrupt.”
I finally see the problem that our public officials are having in convincing those outside of LA and especially Congress that LA is not corrupt. Outside of LA and in virtually any English dictionary the definition of “corrupt” is: “To change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions. To degrade with unsound principles or moral values.” Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th Edition.
In other words, those outside of LA determine what is “corrupt” based on a broader sense of right and wrong and not merely something that is set forth in the law books as being illegal.
As The Captain said to Luke in the movie Cool Hand Luke (1967): “What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.â€
Either we, in LA, have to change our definition of “corrupt” or we have to convince everyone else to change theirs.
C.B.
Uncategorized 8:00 am

