Governor vetoes bad bill!!! Friday, Jun 23 2006 

KUDOS TO GOVERNOR BLANCO!

On Thursday, just 3 days after it passed the lege, Governor Blanco vetoed House Bill No. 1028. This was a horrible, self-serving, bill that would have provided, at taxpayer expense, health insurance for certain leges for the rest of their lives.

Thanks to all to took part in the democratic process by contacting the governor asking her to save us from our leges. Thanks to Governor Blanco for listening to us.

If only our leges cared as much about our views as does our governor, we would finally return Louisiana to its rightful owners — the citizens.

C.B.

Leges just don’t get it Thursday, Jun 22 2006 

Our leges are still having a problem understanding what is their job.

On Tuesday, Rep. Jim Tucker, R-Terrytown, was on the statewide Moon Griffon Radio Show. Tucker also was on the show Wednesday. Tucker was talking about the bad vote he and other leges had made on House Bill No. 1028. The bill would require the taxpayers to pay a MINIMUM of 75% of the health care insurance certain leges elected after 1995 for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.

Tucker admitted that he made a bad vote and was asking Governor Blanco to veto the bill. He should have stopped there. He didn’t. He continued on trying to rationalize his bad vote and exposed exactly why the public is in such an uproar over this matter.

Tucker said that his job as co-chairman of the Republican Legislative Delegation is to find Republican candidates to run for the lege. One of the difficulties he found in recruiting candidates was that the individuals he talked to were having a problem finding affordable health insurance. This helped to explain why, yesterday, when Tucker initially explained his bad vote, he said it was a needed perk to get good people to run for the lege. That argument is so transparent that Little Stevie Wonder can see through it.

Obviously, Tucker doesn’t understand that even those of us with health care insurance find it difficult to afford it. However, as middle class, working people, neither can we afford not to have the insurance. Instead of proposing legislation to fix the problem for all of us, Tucker rationalizes the needed to make a special law only for leges; at the expense of the very same taxpayers who cannot afford the current price of health insurance. What makes affordable health insurance more important for elected officials (public servants) than the people they supposedly serve.

Tucker’s rationale reminds me of the actions of another of his Republican colleagues. Rep. “Tank” Powell voted for billions of taxes on us mullets. Then he turned around and requested a tax break in order to build a hotel. If Powell had been the least concerned about his constituents, he would have tried to lower our taxes rather than get a special tax break for himself.

Rep. Tucker obviously has not studied the Law of Holes which says once one finds oneself in a hole, stop digging.

Finally, the only way out now for Tucker and others who fear that this vote will come back, rightfully so, haunt them when they run for reelection next year is to make sure that the governor vetoes the bill. A simple letter to the governor (which Tucker sent) is not going to accomplish that. The way to get HB 1028 votoed is for the leges to ask the author of the bill, Rep. Hoppy Hopkins, D-Oil City, to request the governor to veto his bill. Anything less is just an effort at C.Y.A. and to fool the public.

C.B.

Better is unacceptable! Wednesday, Jun 21 2006 

A false sense of security is worse than no security. At least with the latter, we citizens will not depend on government agencies to protect us and their property as they mistakenly did with Hurricane Katrina. Yet, our public officials are still in denial despite the loss of more than 1,500 souls and billions of dollars in personal property.

The comments by Colonel Jeff Smith, acting director of the governor’s homeland security office in a recent AP story is proof of this denial. In his response to a report that LA’s plan for future disasters is “insufficient” Smith says: “That’s bologna. We certainly are much better prepared than we were in previous years.”

Being better prepared and “insufficient” are not mutually exclusive. “Better” only means that we may only get nine feet of water, instead of 10 feet in our houses. “Better” means that it may only take 2 days to rescue people rather than 3 days. “Better” means that we may only lose a thousand souls rather than in excess of 1,500.

Perhaps the Colonel is relying too much on his military training where a certain level of casualties is acceptable in achieving a goal. However, in this case we are talking about a plan for saving civilian lives and property in AMERICA. There should be no acceptable level of causalities.

We are already in the midst of another hurricane season. This report should be a wake-up call. By his own admission, Colonel Smith indicates that while are merely better prepared; we are not yet prepared.

Better is simply unacceptable! It is certainly INSUFFICIENT!

Get with the program Colonel!

C.B.

« Previous PageNext Page »