LA regulators are jokes Tuesday, Oct 31 2006

On Sunday, October 22, “Watchcat” Robert Scott wrote an interesting story in the Daily Monopoly that has not received much attention. It involves a major casino company’s allegedly (Have to say allegedly because nobody responsible will investigate.) illegal political contributions.
The story make an important point about LA’s “look the other way” attitude toward the powerful and politically-connected. Contrast that with the boards willingness to take on the Internet Bloggers when they don’t even have jurisdiction.
Note these excerpts about the “Heh, Heh, Heh, Ethics Board” about the contribution by Pinnacle:
The ethics board has taken no action against Pinnacle for the contributions or for similar Pinnacle contributions to a PAC in 2002.
Louisiana’s campaign finance law says PACs related to a referendum cannot receive contributions of more than $100,000 from any one person or company in a four-year period.
“It appears that the PAC received excessive contributions from a single source,” said the board’s ethics administrator Gray Sexton.
This begs the question of the Heh, Heh, Heh, Ethics Board’s failure to initiate an investigation or complaint. The excuse will likely be that nobody has filed a formal complaint as required by the law. The law, before it was “reformed” by the leges allowed for anonymous complaints as well as board initiated complaints to be considered. My question is why doesn’t a member of the board file a formal complaint as a citizen?
Note this excerpt from the “Gambling Promotion and Protection Board:”
That plan caught the attention of Baton Rouge lawyer Karl Koch, who owns a home next door to the proposed casino site. Koch, whose clients include video poker interests, started investigating Pinnacle’s activities and discovered the PAC contribution.
He raised the issue last week with the Louisiana Gaming and Control Board, which decided to take no action. Koch asked the Gaming Board to request State Police to examine the matter. State Police regulates gambling companies and determines their suitability to do business in Louisiana.
Gaming Board Chairman Charles Gaudin refused but said Koch was welcome to take up the matter with State Police. Koch said he would request an inquiry from State Police and the state attorney general.
The board chairman’s attitude would be like bringing to the attention of city police officer an armed robbery going down and the officer telling the citizen to call the State Police.
This may help explain why I name the two toothless tiger boards as I do.
Kudos to “Watchcat” Robert Scott. Thankfully, we have a few “watchcats” because the “watchdogs” are all asleep under the porch.
C.B.
Uncategorized 8:41 am

